Connect with us

Blogs

Nepal’s Insurance Sector Premium Collection Update Till Mangsir 2081

Published

on

Insurance Sector Premium Collection Update

The insurance sector in Nepal, both Life and Non-Life, is very competitive, with many companies working hard to meet their goals. Collecting premiums is a major challenge. However, according to the Nepal Insurance Authority, the first four months of the fiscal year 2081/82, up to the end of Mangsir, have seen significant achievements, highlighting the top performers in the industry.

Life Insurance Sector

As of the end of Mangsir in fiscal year 2081/82, the Life Insurance Sector reported 13,342,246 active policies and collected premiums totaling Rs. 65.74 Arba.

Top Performers:

Nepal Life Insurance Company Limited

  • Premium Collected: Rs. 18.76 Arba (highest among life insurers)
  • Active Policies: 1,723,339

Reliable Nepal Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

  • Active Policies: 2,439,890 (highest among life insurers)
  • Premium Collected: Rs. 1.92 Arba

Details of Insurer Counting Life Insurance Till Mangsir FY 2081/82

S.N Insurer Total Active Insurance Policies Total Insurance Charges (Rs. Lakhs)
1 Nepal Life Insurance Company Limited 1,723,339 187,648.32
2 National Life Insurance Company Limited 1,567,634 79,868.20
3 Life Insurance Corporation Limited 686,629 76,636.48
4 Himalayan Life Insurance Limited 401,791 67,914.59
5 Surya Jyoti Life Insurance Company Limited 850,769 39,968.25
6 Asian Life Insurance Company Limited 728,168 33,604.41
7 Citizen Life Insurance Company Limited 1,073,535 26,554.29
8 Sanima Reliance Life Insurance Limited 843,727 25,975.21
9 Met Life 728,092 23,320.13
10 Rastriya Jeewan Beema 580,011 22,581.23
11 Prabhu Mahalaxmi Life Insurance Limited 189,042 19,425.49
12 Reliable Nepal Life Insurance Company Ltd. 2,493,890 19,215.96
13 IME Life Insurance Company Limited 592,437 18,949.73
14 Sun Nepal Life Insurance Company Limited 883,182 15,756.20
Total 13,342,246 657,418.49

 Non-Life Insurance Sector

In the Non-Life Insurance Sector, 1,137,272 active policies were recorded, with total premiums amounting to Rs. 17.17 Arba.

Top Performers:

Sagarmatha Lumbini Insurance Limited

  • Premium Collected: Rs. 2.19 Arba (highest among non-life insurers)

Siddhartha Premier Insurance Limited

  • Active Policies: 125,155 (highest among non-life insurers)
  • Premium Collected: Rs. 1.76 Arba

Details of Insurer Counting Non-Life Insurance Till Mangsir FY 2081/82

S.N Insurer Total Active Insurance Policies Total Insurance Charges (Rs. Lakhs)
1 Sagarmatha Lumbini Insurance Co Ltd 115,328 21,998.36
2 Siddhartha Premier Insurance Ltd 125,155 17,685.85
3 Shikhar Insurance Co Ltd 122,961 17,425.74
4 IGI Prudential Insurance Company Ltd 86,608 14,552.70
5 Neco Insurance Ltd 120,667 14,038.21
6 Himalayan Everest Insurance Co Ltd 104,788 14,009.25
7 NLG Insurance Co. Ltd 78,517 11,306.07
8 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd 18,092 11,269.00
9 United Ajod Insurance Co Ltd 72,796 10,255.68
10 Sanima GIC Insurance Ltd 52,264 9,974.58
11 Nepal Insurance Co. Ltd 78,171 9,446.93
12 Prabhu Insurance Ltd 52,525 7,668.42
13 Rastriya Beema Company Ltd 97,595 6,711.89
14 National Insurance Co. Ltd 11,805 5,434.93
Total 1,137,272 171,777.61

 Insights

The data reveals intense competition in Nepal’s insurance market. Companies employ varied strategies to achieve dominance:

  • Nepal Life Insurance Company leads in premium collection with a smaller policy base, emphasizing high-value policies.
  • Reliable Nepal Life Insurance has the most active policies but relatively lower premium revenue, indicating a focus on policy volume.
  • In the Non-Life sector, Sagarmatha Lumbini Insurance Limited dominates premium collection, while Siddhartha Premier Insurance Limited leads in policy count.

This dynamic competition underscores the strategic diversity among insurance providers, each leveraging their strengths in policy numbers and premium revenues to secure market leadership.

Continue Reading

Blogs

Private Power Producers Protest ‘Take and Pay’ Provision in Budget

Published

on

By

Take and Pay

Private energy entrepreneurs in Nepal have taken to social media, protesting the government’s decision to introduce the ‘Take and Pay’ (Liu Ra Tir) system for electricity purchase agreements (PPA) in the new fiscal year budget.

Under this system, the government would only pay for the electricity it uses, instead of paying for the total electricity generated by hydropower projects. Entrepreneurs argue this move could severely hurt the private sector, discourage investment, and push the country back toward power shortages.

Online Campaign Targets Top Officials

Energy producers are now directly appealing to key government figures. They have publicly tagged Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal, Finance Minister Barshaman Pun, Energy Minister Shakti Bahadur Basnet, and NEA Executive Director Kulman Ghising on social media, urging them to withdraw the Take and Pay provision.

This digital campaign comes just days after developers handed over a memorandum to the Prime Minister and bombarded top officials with hundreds of SMS messages requesting the same.

Why Are Entrepreneurs Worried?

Entrepreneurs claim that this decision will:

  • Weaken the private sector’s role in the energy industry 
  • Risk the return of load-shedding (power cuts) 
  • Causes financial losses to investors 
  • Damage the overall economy 

The Independent Power Producers’ Association of Nepal (IPPAN) has strongly opposed the provision. According to IPPAN’s Vice President and protest coordinator Mohan Kumar Dangi, the policy shift will discourage private hydropower development, especially for Run-of-River (RoR) projects, which are most affected by the new model.

Ongoing Protests and Next Steps

Since Asar 6, private power developers have been staging a phase-wise protest. On the third day of their movement, they moved their campaign to social media to raise public awareness and pressure the government.

Dangi warned that if the government ignores these peaceful efforts, the protests will escalate. Planned steps include:

  1. Lobbying political party leaders in Parliament 
  2. Launching a nationwide street protest 
  3. Returning the keys of privately built hydropower projects to the government — a symbolic act of handing over control 

Background: The Budget Controversy

The controversy started when the budget for FY 2082/83 (announced on Jestha 15) stated that all future PPAs for RoR hydropower projects would be done under the Take and Pay model only. This was a major change from the previous Take or Pay model, where producers were paid even if electricity wasn’t consumed, offering more security for private investors.

Conclusion

The ‘Take and Pay’ decision has sparked serious concerns across Nepal’s private energy sector. Developers fear this could lead to a slowdown in future hydropower investments, and possibly, a return to unstable electricity supply. With pressure mounting both online and offline, the government’s next move will be critical for the future of Nepal’s energy landscape.

Continue Reading

Blogs

Nepal Rastra Bank to Withdraw NPR 60 Billion from the Banking System on Monday

Published

on

By

Nepal Rastra Bank to Withdraw NPR 60 Billion

Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB), the central bank of Nepal, has announced it will withdraw NPR 60 billion in deposits from the banking system on Monday through a deposit collection auction. This move comes as excess liquidity continues to remain in the banking sector since the beginning of the current fiscal year 2081/82.

According to NRB, the withdrawal will be conducted through the online bidding system, and the interest rate will be determined through competitive bidding. The collected amount, including both principal and interest, will be settled on Shrawan 18, 2082 (August 2, 2025).

Key Auction Details

  • Total Amount: NPR 60 billion
  • Minimum Bid Amount: NPR 100 million
  • Bid Increments: Must be divisible by NPR 50 million
  • Eligible Participants: Class ‘A’, ‘B’, and ‘C’ licensed banks and financial institutions
  • Auction Method: Competitive bidding via NRB’s online platform
  • Maturity & Settlement Date: Shrawan 18, 2082

Why Is the Central Bank Taking This Step?

As per NRB, the banking system is currently holding excessive liquidity, with total deposits crossing NPR 7 trillion. However, this liquidity is not being effectively utilized, as loan disbursement has remained slow. This reflects a lack of investor confidence and limited credit demand in the economy.

To control liquidity and stabilize the financial market, NRB has been consistently withdrawing funds using monetary tools since the start of the fiscal year. Tools like reverse repo, outright sale, deposit collection, and bond issuance are being used depending on the situation, whether there is too much or too little money in the system.

Recent Trends in Liquidity Control

Last week alone, NRB withdrew NPR 90 billion in a single day, highlighting the ongoing efforts to manage surplus liquidity. The central bank is using such actions not only when there is an overflow of money but also in times of shortage, to maintain balance in the financial system.

Conclusion

The decision to withdraw NPR 60 billion on Monday shows that Nepal Rastra Bank is actively managing liquidity to ensure financial stability. With a large amount of unused funds in the system, these measures are crucial to prevent inflation, reduce financial risk, and encourage more effective use of capital in the economy.

Continue Reading

Blogs

52-Week Low & High Microfinance Shares in Nepal: Current Status and Future Outlook

Published

on

By

Low & High Microfinance Shares

The microfinance sector in Nepal has been moving sideways for a long time. The group sub-index has been fluctuating between 4,600 and 5,600. Recently, the index reached a swing high of nearly 4,900 but then closed at 4,671.74.

The national budget did not bring any immediate changes that could affect the capital market. So, investors are now waiting for the upcoming monetary policy. After the newly appointed Governor of Nepal Rastra Bank, Dr. Bishwanath Paudel, reduced the risk weight on margin loans from 125% to 100% during the third quarterly review, investor confidence grew.

Investors now hope that the following changes will be introduced in the next monetary policy:

  • Removal of the current Rs. 15 crore limit on individual investment
  • Removal of the 15% dividend cap on microfinance institutions
  • Permission for banks and financial institutions to trade shares for less than one year

Governor Paudel’s public remarks have made investors hopeful that the upcoming monetary policy will be share-market friendly.

Despite the pressure on the market at the end of Ashar, investors are optimistic about a rebound afterward. Experts say microfinance and insurance stocks—whose prices have not surged yet compared to others—might offer better opportunities in the coming days.

Top 20 Microfinance Companies Nearest to 52-Week Low

Top 20 Microfinance Companies Nearest to 52-Week Low

Some microfinance companies are trading close to their 52-week low prices. These stocks may offer good value for long-term investors. Here are some examples:

  • Nesdo Samriddhi Microfinance had a high of Rs. 2,641 and a low of Rs. 1,540 in the past year. It is currently trading near its lowest point.

  • Sana Kisan Bikas Microfinance and Jan Utthan Community Microfinance are both trading less than 1% above their 52-week lows.

  • Jeevan Bikas, NIC Asia, Infinity, Suryodaya Womi, RSDC, Asha, and Swabalamban Microfinance are trading just 1–3% above their yearly lows.

  • Other companies like Unique Nepal, Bijaya, Forward, Nirdhan Utthan, Diprox, Mahuli, Nerude Mirmire, National, Samata Gharelu, and Laxmi Microfinance are also trading only 3–5.5% above their low points.

According to experts, these stocks could be worth watching for those looking to invest at lower prices.

Microfinance Stocks Near 52-Week High

Microfinance Stocks Near 52-Week High

Interestingly, a few companies are still trading near their 52-week highs even though the overall market is in a downtrend:

  • Unnati Sahakarya Microfinance reached a high of Rs. 5,276 and is now trading at around Rs. 1,804.

  • CYCL Nepal Microfinance had a high of Rs. 1,958 and is still trading at Rs. 1,615, which is relatively strong.

On the other hand, many microfinance stocks are trading 20–40% below their 52-week highs:

  • Aatmanirbhar, Mahila, Grameen Bikas, Kalika, Global IME, Chhimek, Mero Microfinance, and Abhiyan are all trading 22% to 31% below their highs.

  • NMB, First Microfinance, RSDC, Laxmi, Nirdhan Utthan, Diprox, Sana Kisan, Mithila, National, and Swabhiman are trading 34% to 44% below their 52-week highs.

These stocks may still have room to rise if the market recovers and favorable policies are introduced.


Conclusion

The microfinance sector in Nepal is at a turning point. While the market has been moving sideways, investor confidence is building, especially with hopes for a supportive monetary policy. Stocks near their 52-week lows may offer attractive entry points, while those holding near their highs show relative strength.

For both new and experienced investors, this could be a good time to study the microfinance sector closely and plan for the long term. As always, careful research and risk assessment are essential before making any investment decisions.

Continue Reading

Trending